Skip to content

[py] Bump ruff version #15818

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 29, 2025
Merged

[py] Bump ruff version #15818

merged 1 commit into from
May 29, 2025

Conversation

cgoldberg
Copy link
Contributor

@cgoldberg cgoldberg commented May 29, 2025

User description

💥 What does this PR do?

Bump ruff version to 0.11.12


PR Type

enhancement


Description

  • Update ruff dependency to version 0.11.12

  • Ensures latest linting features and fixes are used


Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Configuration changes
tox.ini
Update ruff version in tox.ini for linting                             

py/tox.ini

  • Updated ruff version from 0.11.11 to 0.11.12 in linting environment
  • Maintains up-to-date linting tool for Python codebase
  • +1/-1     

    Need help?
  • Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about Qodo Merge usage.
  • Check out the documentation for more information.
  • Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ No major issues detected

    @selenium-ci selenium-ci added the C-py Python Bindings label May 29, 2025
    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    No code suggestions found for the PR.

    @cgoldberg cgoldberg merged commit 8fdc63a into SeleniumHQ:trunk May 29, 2025
    7 checks passed
    @cgoldberg cgoldberg deleted the py-bump-ruff branch May 29, 2025 13:41
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants